By Kayla Graffam
Reimagining Public History Through Community Memory

When Dana Royster-Buefort, a retired teacher, sat down with a stack of yearbooks from her time at Thompson Middle School, she wasn’t just sharing photographs. She was preserving the heartbeat of Boston’s educational past. She could point out any of her past students, telling a story for each one. This moment, captured during the 2025 Boston Teachers Union Digitizing Day, reflects the power that participatory archiving holds to humanize our history. Public history, at its core, is an effort to democratize the past. It is grounded in the belief that history does not solely reside in official documents or in the interpretations of professional historians, but is also embedded in the experiences, materials, and memories of individuals and communities. However, many community members never have the chance to document their history in a formal capacity.
A Collaboration Rooted in Community
On Wednesday, June 25th, 2025, UMass Boston archivists, historians, and students
partnered with the Boston Teachers Union (BTU) to host a Digitizing Day, encouraging BTU
members past and current to bring in photographs, documents, yearbooks and more that they
wished to contribute to the growing BTU Collections, hosted at UMass Boston. The participatory
archiving model and program we used for this event was developed as the Mass Memories Road
Show at UMass Boston, where it has been going strong for 21 years. (Mass Memories Road
Show) While the road show model was originally designed as a one time, community based
event, the model has been expanded to work directly with community organizations and
institutions, including the BTU in 2018 (BTU 2018) as part of larger collecting initiatives.

These events are not simply a documentation effort. They are an act of collective memory-making. By centering the voices of educators and school workers, events like these preserve underrepresented narratives and highlight the role that teachers play as both witnesses to and participants in Boston’s ongoing struggles for equity and justice in the public education system. The 2018 event with the Boston Teachers Union launched a larger initiative to record the experiences of BTU educators and staff, and continue building a community archive that is reflective of their perspectives and their stories.
Now, in 2025, thanks to funding from the Mellon Foundation by way of UC-Irvine, we have been able to continue the work of participatory archiving and set up the Boston Teachers Union for success in hosting future events themselves. Not only were we able to have the event thanks to the Mellon Grant, we were also able to purchase all new camera and recording equipment for BTU to record more oral histories and events, as well as purchase a scanner for digitizing in the future.
On the day, we collected a number of incredible photographs and documents, including yearbook photos, pictures of field trips, and even t-shirts. Using Mellon grant funds, UMass Boston Archives also helped the Boston Teachers Union collect a number of recorded histories in video form with our Video Station at the event. Union members could sit and discuss some of their favorite memories as well as thoughts on certain topics and issues, and the discussions were recorded to be uploaded onto the website and included in the digital collections.
Challenging Traditional Archival Norms
Participatory Archiving events like these ones help to challenge traditional assumptions surrounding history and historical preservation. Conventional archives are often privileged records produced by institutions, whether they be government agencies, large organizations, or famous figures. These histories are often prioritized over those generated by individuals and grassroots organizations. These imbalances can reinforce narratives that center power while marginalizing the perspectives of those directly affected by policy decisions, like the desegregation of Boston schools or the development of programming for students with disabilities. While the Boston Teachers Union is a larger organization, it wasn’t always, and there is plenty of room for growth and expansion when it comes to documenting and sharing BTU history.
Participatory archiving provides an alternative model. Rather than collecting materials about communities (as outsiders looking in), we are able to work directly with community members who can identify, describe, and contextualize the records being collected. This process shifts the authority and expertise, recognizing that those who lived the history are best positioned to interpret and give meaning to it.
My Role in the Event as a UMB Graduate Student
In preparation for this event, I spent my time doing a number of things. My main task was developing timelines of events for our three main topics of interest: School Closures, Students with Disabilities, and Desegregation and Busing in the Boston area. These topics were chosen for specific reasons. As both a labor union and a long-standing force in Boston’s public education system, the BTU offers a rare window into how teachers have shaped (and been shaped by) major historical moments like desegregation, school closures, and inclusion reform.

This past school year marked the 50th anniversary of the beginning of court-ordered school desegregation. (Colors of Solidarity) Many current and retired BTU members experienced this firsthand, either as students or teachers. Considering the anniversary, we wanted to take the opportunity to ask those who experienced the results of Judge Garrity’s decision first hand about their experience. (Snapshot: Desegregation 1974).
School closures are a constant feature of BTU and Boston history, and a major point of contention throughout the past 50 years. With closures continuing even today, with the closure of Lilla Frederick Middle School in Dorchester. (Frederick Middle School) School closures are an ongoing conversation, and making it a focus during this Digitizing Day allowed educators active and retired the opportunity to discuss their thoughts and feelings around these closures.
We also had a heavy focus on inclusion and special education in Boston public schools,
especially considering the ongoing organization for BTU’s “inclusion done right” initiative. We
focused on the development of programs for special education and adequate pay and funding for
teachers and paraprofessionals. (BTU Inclusion) We wanted to take this opportunity to give
educators the chance to speak about their experience with these programs and reflect on how this
experience has changed over time.
Using the information we already have available to us, gathered from previous
participatory archiving events, I was able to develop simple timelines that offered an overview of
the topics, highlighting specific events that shaped and changed life for students and teachers
alike. In addition to research and planning, I helped with site visits, equipment set-up, and
helping to ensure that volunteers had everything they needed for a successful day.
As a Public History student, this experience has been incredibly valuable. Not only did I
have the opportunity to witness the behind the scenes aspects of organizing an event like this
one, I was able to actively participate in the process, working directly with BTU employees,
doing site visits and helping purchase equipment that was used for the event. I also helped the
volunteers, and was working directly with the community members who were coming to
participate in the event. I was able to meet many of them, discuss the items and documents they
were bringing in, and learned about their time as educators. I spoke with one teacher, Roberta
Cohen who used to take her students on field trips every other month. We spoke for nearly thirty
minutes, discussing all the students she had as she showed me photo album after photo album, all
images she had taken of her students.
What Counts as History?

Photo by Nick Juravich.
One thing that really stuck out to me throughout my time at the BTU was how many people didn’t realize what “counted” as history. I spoke with a number of different people, some BTU members, some retired volunteers, and some current teachers, who were under the impression that photographs were what “counted” as history, and that’s all we were looking to digitize. I remember mentioning to one of the volunteers that I was hoping people would bring some lesson plans, as I had a special interest in seeing how lesson planning has changed over the last few decades. She seemed confused, and asked if that counted. I explained that history, and what is considered important to collect and document, is anything that you consider important, or find special. It doesn’t have to be simply photographs or yearbooks. It could be lesson plans, notes from students, gradebooks, even physical items like t-shirts or student gifts. What makes participatory archiving and community archives unique and important is the fact that we are collecting personal stories and things that might not have been deemed important by others.
Looking Ahead
Our work isn’t finished. I will be continuing to work with the BTU, the UMB Archives,
and Professor Juravich to further organize and categorize the items that we collected. We will
work to get the images uploaded to the digital archive and made available to the public. I will
also be working with Professor Juravich to develop a Digital Exhibit based on the materials we
collected, to add to the current digital exhibitions that have been posted throughout the years
these events have been taking place. I hope to find some common threads between the
photographs and other items we digitized.
After this event and beginning the digitization process, I can’t help but reflect on how
many powerful stories still remain untold. This past event gave us the opportunity to speak with
and record the history of 16) people. In just four hours, we gathered a large number of stories
that deserve to be preserved forever. We can only guess as to what will be accomplished as BTU
continues this event on their own. Participatory archiving offers a path forward, not only to
preserve the past, but to shape a more inclusive and equitable historical record.
Leave a comment