Scholars for Puerto Rico Relief

A house floats in water after flood waters from Hurricane Maria

Professor Marisol Negrón
Assistant Professor with tenure of American Studies and Latino Studies

Originally published on October 11, 2017 on Avidly, a channel of the Los Angeles Review of Books.

Available at
http://avidly.lareviewofbooks.org/2017/10/11/scholars-for-puerto-rico-relief/

*
The fundraising campaign referred to in the essay ended on January 30, 2018.

Two weeks after Hurricane Maria struck Puerto Rico, conditions are still dire and in some regions actually worsening. In the wake of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, approximately 3.5 million residents were without electricity, and without secure access to food, water, medical care, transportation, stable telecommunications, and other necessities. The latest reports show that continued support for Puerto Rico’s residents is needed — particularly as the media’s attention turns elsewhere.

We are scholars committed to supporting Puerto Rico relief and recovery efforts in the aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Maria. We join others who are increasing awareness of the humanitarian and environmental crisis in Puerto Rico and raising funds for ongoing emergency recovery efforts.  All funds raised by Scholars for Puerto Rico will be donated to three community-based organizations who are integral to both immediate and long-term sustainable recovery in Puerto Rico:  Casa Pueblo, Organización Pro Ambiente Sustentable, and Taller Salud. 

Since the passage of Hurricane Maria, numerous accounts continue to circulate of the widespread destruction of homes, schools, hospitals, and even whole towns in Puerto Rico. Many Puerto Ricans, both there and in the diaspora, remain unable to reach family and friends throughout the territory because vast swaths of Puerto Rico remain without communication. Moreover, reliable news outlets in Puerto Rico estimate that once communication and transportation are reestablished throughout the territory, the official death toll from Hurricane Maria could soar. Still, the U.S. federal government’s response to the crisis in this US territory has been lackluster at best, even though Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens.

Puerto Rico was a colony of Spain until the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898. Considered a war prize, Puerto Rico, along with several other territories, became a colony of the United States. The Jones-Shaforth Act passed by Congress in 1917 granted Puerto Ricans citizenship. However, those residing in the US territory of Puerto Rico do not enjoy the same civic rights as their mainland counterparts. For example, while residents of Puerto Rico can be drafted into the military, they cannot vote for President and lack voting representation in Congress. Puerto Rico’s limited representation has left the territory with few advocates within the U.S. government to push for meaningful and sustained federal relief during this time of crisis.

Puerto Ricans have long been treated as second-class citizens due to the territory’s colonial status. Hurricane Maria has exposed the continued effects of colonialism on the territory since the early 20th century. The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (also known as the Jones Act) requires that all goods shipped to Puerto Rico arrive from U.S. ports, on U.S.-constructed ships, with U.S. crews. The Jones Act therefore greatly raises the cost of transporting goods as well as their purchase prices once they arrive in Puerto Rico. In the wake of Hurricane Maria, the Jones Act inflates the time and cost of transporting supplies, personnel, and equipment for Puerto Rico’s recovery efforts from foreign countries.  Ships carrying aid to Puerto Rico from countries like the Dominican Republic and Cuba, which have both offered help, cannot deliver aid directly to a port in the territory. They would instead have to travel to a port on the U.S. mainland before transporting aid to their Caribbean neighbor. On September 28, the Trump administration suspended the Jones Act for ten days to facilitate hurricane relief. However, with recovery efforts expected to take months, a reimposition of the Jones Act will obstruct the ability of aid to reach Puerto Rico in a timely fashion.

Since Hurricane Maria, the federal fiscal control board installed by the US government in 2016 to oversee the territory’s finances has only authorized $1bn to fund the recovery. This is nowhere near the amount Puerto Rico will need to not only rebuild, but create a more sustainable and disaster resistant infrastructure. The federal government has also failed to announce a moratorium on Puerto Rico’s debt repayment or consider any form of debt forgiveness in light of Maria’s catastrophic effects.

The physical and technological infrastructural collapse that followed Hurricane Maria was enabled by more than a decade of austerity measures imposed by the local and federal governments to deal with Puerto Rico’s mounting debt. These austerity measures starved public utilities of the funds needed to make repairs and upgrades and left Puerto Rico’s infrastructure particularly vulnerable. Puerto Rico cannot be rebuilt on a foundation of austerity and colonial neglect.

We must support and aid community-based organizations in Puerto Rico working to rebuild the territory amidst structural inequalities of colonialism and inadequate support from the federal government. In addition to the most basic supplies, Puerto Rico needs billions of dollars to rebuild its infrastructure, homes, and institutions like hospitals, government buildings, and schools. Community-based organizations like Casa Pueblo, Organización Pro Ambiente Sustentable, and Taller Salud are central to the recovery and rebuilding of Puerto Rico. 

  • Casa Pueblo, an organization dedicated to community empowerment and the protection of natural and cultural resources;
  • Organización Pro Ambiente Sustentable (OPAS), an environmental organization whose programming efforts focus on education about and management of sustainable resources; and
  •  Taller Salud, which works to improve the lives of girls and women, particularly in under-resourced communities.

We stand in solidarity with Puerto Rico and all those committed to not only rebuild but transform Puerto Rico with long-term sustainable recovery and recuperation initiatives …

Update 2/1/2018:

The initial campaign raised $28,756. A second campaign raised an additional $8,254 to support relief and recovery efforts of the three organizations below:

  • IDEBAJO, a consortium of organizations in the Jobos Bay region that advocates for environmentally preferred alternatives in community development;
  • Comedores Sociales de Puerto Rico, a grassroots food distribution initiative that began in 2013 in response to the economic crisis;  and
  • PECES, an organization that fosters social, economic, and educational development in under-resourced communities.

For additional information, we recommend the Puerto Rico Syllabus, which contains materials for thinking critically about the Puerto Rico debt crisis and the destruction caused by Hurricane Maria, the storm’s aftermath, and what the storm revealed about the colonial relationship, debt and austerity, and the unequal vulnerability of Puerto Rico’s residents. The syllabus also includes additional teaching tools and media resources for use in classrooms.

Scholars for Puerto Rico*

*Scholars for Puerto Rico is not a group, but rather an effort to raise funds for recovery efforts in the territory. Several scholars worked collaboratively to bring this fundraising campaign to fruition: Frances Aparicio (Northwestern University), Arlene Dávila (New York University), Zaire Dinzey-Flores (Rutgers University), Lorena Estrada-Martínez (University of Massachusetts Boston), Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes (University of Michigan), Marisol LeBrón (Dickinson College), Marisol Negrón (University of Massachusetts Boston), Jade Power-Sotomayor (University of Washington Bothell), Lorna Rivera (University of Massachusetts Boston), Petra Rivera-Rideau (Wellesley College), and Wilson Valentín-Escobar (Hampshire College).

Scholars for Puerto Rico is in partnership with Scholars for Haiti and thanks Yveline Alexis, Nadège T. Clitandre, Marlene Daut, Darlene Dubuisson, April Mayes, and Kyla Wazana Tompkins for their support.

Authorship note: Professor Negrón is one of several scholars who worked collaboratively to organize the effort to raise funds for community organizations engaged in relief and recovery efforts after Hurricane Maria. Scholars for Puerto Rico is not a group, but rather an effort to raise funds for recovery efforts in the territory. Several scholars worked collaboratively to bring this fundraising campaign to fruition: Frances Aparicio (Northwestern University), Arlene Dávila (New York University), Zaire Dinzey-Flores (Rutgers University), Lorena Estrada-Martínez (University of Massachusetts Boston), Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes (University of Michigan), Marisol LeBrón (Dickinson College), Marisol Negrón (University of Massachusetts Boston), Jade Power-Sotomayor (University of Washington Bothell), Lorna Rivera (University of Massachusetts Boston), Petra Rivera-Rideau (Wellesley College), and Wilson Valentín-Escobar (Hampshire College).

Originally published on October 11, 2017 on Avidly, a channel of the Los Angeles Review of Books. Available at http://avidly.lareviewofbooks.org/2017/10/11/scholars-for-puerto-rico-relief/

Using a faucet is a privilege

Zainab Salejwala
TCCS ’19

Image of a dirty faucet

“Something is wrong and nobody is listening…We’re fighting for social justice and reparations but we’re [also] sick…”

Using a faucet is a privilege. Sounds funny right? Maybe a little. What about pipes and faucets that aren’t orange-y brown that has clean water? Doubly-privileged?

On Thursday, February 8th, I attended a lecture called Flint Rising in the McCormick Lounge that overlooks the UMass Boston harbor. The sky turning soft pastels, the water unmoving heavily contrasted the harsh topic of the event- the water crisis in Flint, Michigan.

The problem started on March 2011 when there was a $25 million deficit. In 2014 the state was building a new pipeline to deliver water from Lake Huron but the city switched to Flint River, a river that is a non-drinkable water source and has been historically contaminated. Two activists who have been at the forefront of this issue are Nayyirah Shariff and Gina Luster. When the issue happened, Michigan passed an emergency law but never declared a state of emergency.

Both Nayyirah and Gina talked about how they started to notice the water changing colors to the way it smelt ranging from “tea, honey, dark liquor, dead body, straight bleach to trash.”

Gina would call the state and water systems, but they would keep telling her that it was probably just a “flush” where the water system is cleaned and it tastes a little chemically and bad for a few days. But as days turned into weeks and as weeks turned into months, the water didn’t improve. And it still hasn’t improved even today.  This is how you dismiss a whole population.

Two water activists from Flint, Michigan, speaking at UMass Boston.
Nayyirah and Gina speaking at UMass Boston

Gina, 40, started losing weight, having broken teeth, fainting, and needing to walk with a cane. Nayyirah has seizures. In the middle of talking Gina paused, inhaled and let silence stretch out. And she explained, “Sorry, I need to catch my breath.”

Gina also mentioned how her daughter also gets rashes from the water.

Her daughter only knows of attending school with her backpack full of a day’s supply of water bottles and yellow caution tape or black trash bags wrapped around the water fountains. Nayyirah stressed, “How can you dismiss a whole population?”

To answer that question, Pulido (2016) states: “..[P]eople of Flint are so devalued… based on both their blackness and their surplus status… the devaluation of black bodies has been a central feature of global capitalism” (p. 1).

Gina again stressed, “What kind of message is my daughter getting when she sees those caution tapes?” Nayyirah mentioned that there is no tracking of health programs, no counseling and no curriculum or public health education in response to what is happening.

The water in Flint had extremely high levels of lead which can cause serious health problems. The government kept lying to its citizens and providing them with misinformation. Flint residents who decide to leave do not qualify for health services in other neighboring states.  This is how you dismiss a whole population.

For instance, the government would tell residents to boil water which, in reality, makes the lead and other toxic substances more concentrated and harmful. This is how you dismiss a whole population.

The water facility that the city decided to utilize had “not been fully operational in almost 50 years, was understaffed, and some of the staff were undertrained it is not surprising that it was difficult to achieve effective treatment”  (Masten, 2016, p.27). This is how you dismiss a whole population.

In Flint, there was also a community of people who only spoke Spanish but the government refused to translate fliers about the dangers of their water supply.  This is how you dismiss a whole population.

A sign reading "Water Pickup" from Flint, Michigan

The situation in Flint reminds me of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Both situations in Flint and North Dakota are about environmental injustice heavily tied to racism, capitalism, hegemony of english, the privatization and access to resources. Both these crises “require attention to the past and how wealth, power, and poverty have historically been created” (Pulido, 2016, p.4). Water is a human right and you should not be able to profile of it.

I can’t believe how the poisoning of the public water supply in Flint has continued for so many years.

Nayyirah and Gina are still fighting for justice. The city is going to stop giving out free water at the end of the month (February 2018) and I hope that, individually and as a program, we are able to take action and help the citizens of Flint, MI.

When you wake up and brush your teeth. Unscrew the cap. Capitalism. When you want to rinse your vegetables under the sink for your salad. Racism. Hold up the two gallon water bottle with your sore arms that have not habituated to the weight of the water although you have been doing this for years now. Lead. Legionnaires. Or brew tea in the afternoon. “Tea… Honey… Dark Liquor…”. Broken promises by the government. Break the seal. When you want to bathe and fill up the tub. Listen to the plastic bend and make guttural sounds. Look at the faucet which is a constant reminder of what should be but isn’t. Bottle by bottle. Drop by drop. Next time you drink clean water, think of Flint, Michigan.

References:

Susan J. Masten. Simon H. Davies. Shawn P. McElmurry. (2017). Flint Water Crisis: What Happened and Why?”Journal American Water Works Association. Vol. 108 No. 12, p. 22.

Pulido,L. (2016). Flint, Environmental Racism, and Racial Capitalism, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27:3, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2016.1213013