I have been collecting data where the number of pigs in the simulation is the independent variable and the number of humans infected with H1N1 at 1000 ticks is the dependent variable. In general, the percentage of the population does increase but not by as much as I expected. I thought that there would be a big difference between 200 pigs which infected 84.8% of the population and the 1000 pigs, which only infected 84% of the population. Next week I might alter the chances for recovery because it seems as though too many humans are recovering too fast.
Also, I noticed that pigs are walking into the hospital area so I plan on adding green terrain there and decreasing the chances for the pigs to walk there.
Number of Pigs | Number of Humans infected
with H1N1 at 1000 Ticks |
% of Population |
2 | 42 | 33.6 |
4 | 62 | 49.6 |
6 | 67 | 53.6 |
8 | 69 | 55.2 |
10 | 88 | 70.4 |
15 | 74 | 59.2 |
20 | 79 | 63.2 |
25 | 91 | 72.8 |
50 | 94 | 75.2 |
75 | 92 | 73.6 |
100 | 101 | 80.8 |
200 | 106 | 84.8 |
1000 | 105 | 84 |
April 22, 2017 at 12:10 pm
NICE
I’d draw a graph to see how it looks
the small difference between 200 and 1000 pigs is not so surprising – it’s a saturation curve